Search for: All records

The growing adoption of intelligent Electric Vehicles (EVs) has also created an opportunity for malicious actors to initiate attacks on the EV infrastructure, which can include a number of data exchange protocols across the various entities that are part of the EV charging ecosystem. These protocols possess a range of underlying vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit to disrupt the regular flow of information and energy. While researchers have considered vulnerabilities of particular components within an EV charging ecosystem, there is still a notable gap in vulnerability analysis of charging protocols and the potential threats to these. We investigate threat vectors within the most widely adopted protocols used in EV infrastructure, explore the potential impact of cyberattacks and suggest various mitigation techniques investigated in literature. Potential future research directions are also identified. 

Abstract Langmuir turbulence, a dominant process in the ocean surface boundary layer, drives substantial vertical mixing that influences temperature, salinity, mixed layer depth, and biogeochemical tracer distributions. While direct resolution of Langmuir turbulence in ocean and climate models remains computationally prohibitive, its effects are commonly parameterized, frequently within established turbulent mixing frameworks like the K‐profile parameterization (KPP). This study utilizes a modified KPP that determines boundary layer depth through an integral criterion, diverging from the conventional KPP's dependence on the bulk Richardson number. The modified KPP demonstrates markedly lower sensitivity to model vertical resolution than its conventional counterpart. Building upon this modified KPP framework, we introduce an innovative parameterization scheme for Langmuir mixing effects. We evaluate the performance of this new scheme against existing approaches using a one‐dimensional (1D) column model across four different scenarios, incorporating validation against both large eddy simulation (LES) results and field measurements. Our analysis reveals that the new Langmuir mixing scheme, explicitly designed for the modified KPP framework, performs competitively while maintaining reduced sensitivity to vertical resolution. 

Abstract Enhancement of currents in Earth's ionosphere adversely impacts systems and technologies, and one example of extreme enhancement is supersubstorms. Despite the name, whether a supersubstorm is a substorm remains an open question, because studies suggest that unlike substorms, supersubstorms sometimes affect all local times including the dayside. The spectacular May 2024 storm contains signatures of two supersubstorms that occurred successively in time with similar magnitude and duration, and we explore the nature of them by examining the morphology of the auroral electrojet, the corresponding disturbances in the magnetosphere, and the solar wind driving conditions. The results show that the two events exhibit distinctly different features. The first event was characterized by a locally intensified electrojet followed by a rapid expansion in latitude and local time. Auroral observations showed poleward expansion of auroras (or aurorae), and geosynchronous observations showed thickening of the plasma sheet, magnetic field dipolarization, and energetic particle injections. The second event was characterized by an instantaneous intensification of the electrojet over broad latitude and local time. Auroras did not expand but brightened simultaneously across the sky. Radar and LEO observations showed enhancement of the ionospheric electric field. Therefore, the first event is a substorm, whereas the second event is enhancement of general magnetospheric convection driven by a solar wind pressure increase. These results illustrate that the so‐called supersubstorms have more than one type of driver, and that internal instability in the magnetotail and external driving of the solar wind are equally important in driving extreme auroral electrojet activity. 

Abstract This study utilizes Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to improve the K‐Profile Parameterization (KPP) for the vertical mixing effects in the ocean's surface boundary layer turbulence. The deep neural networks were trained using 11‐year turbulence‐resolving solutions, obtained by running a large eddy simulation model for Ocean Station Papa, to predict the turbulence velocity scale coefficient and unresolved shear coefficient in the KPP. The DNN‐augmented KPP schemes (KPP_DNN) have been implemented in the General Ocean Turbulence Model (GOTM). The KPP_DNN is stable for long‐term integration and more efficient than existing variants of KPP schemes with wave effects. Three different KPP_DNN schemes, each differing in their input and output variables, have been developed and trained. The performance of models utilizing the KPP_DNN schemes is compared to those employing traditional deterministic first‐order and second‐moment closure turbulent mixing parameterizations. Solution comparisons indicate that the simulated mixed layer becomes cooler and deeper when wave effects are included in parameterizations, aligning closer with observations. In the KPP framework, the velocity scale of unresolved shear, which is used to calculate ocean surface boundary layer depth, has a greater impact on the simulated mixed layer than the magnitude of diffusivity does. In the KPP_DNN, unresolved shear depends not only on wave forcing, but also on the mixed layer depth and buoyancy forcing. 

Abstract The vibrational‐translational (VT) excitation of nitrogen molecules led by collisions with fast ions in subauroral ion drifts (SAID) has been conceived as a potential underlying mechanism contributing to the formation of the Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement (STEVE) phenomenon (Harding et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl087102). In this study, we perform quantum calculations of the VT excitation rates of N₂led by fast‐drifting ions, and evaluate the resulting vibrational distribution of N₂with ionospheric/thermospheric parameters expected under intense SAID condition. We conclude that, while the VT energy transfer led by SAID plays a distinguishable role in the vibrational excitation of N₂, it is incapable of populating the high vibrational levels to the required concentration (Harding et al., 2020,https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl087102) to produce adequate nitric oxide density, and in turn the nitrogen‐dioxide continuum intensity, to account for the STEVE brightness. 

Abstract Magnetotail earthward‐propagating fast plasma flows provide important pathways for magnetosphere‐ionosphere coupling. This study reexamines a flow‐related red‐line diffuse‐like aurora event previously reported by Liang et al. (2011,https://doi.org/10.1029/2010ja015867), utilizing THEMIS and ground‐based auroral observations from Poker Flat. We find that time domain structures (TDSs) within the flow bursts efficiently drive electron precipitation below a few keV, aligning with predominantly red‐line auroral intensifications in this non‐substorm event. The diffuse‐like auroras sometimes coexisted with or potentially evolved from discrete forms. We forward model red‐line diffuse auroras due to TDS‐driven precipitation, employing the time‐dependent TREx‐ATM auroral transport code. The good correlation (∼0.77) between our modeled and observed red line emissions underscores that TDSs are a primary driver of the red‐line diffuse‐like auroras, though whistler‐mode wave contributions are needed to fully explain the most intense red‐line emissions. 

Abstract Abrupt variations of auroral electrojets can induce geomagnetically induced currents, and the ability to model and forecast them is a pressing goal of space weather research. We report an auroral electrojet spike event that is extreme in magnitude, explosive in nature, and global in spatial extent that occurred on 24 April 2023. The event serves as a fundamental test of our understanding of the response of the geospace system to solar wind dynamics. Our results illustrate new and important characteristics that are drastically different from existing knowledge. Most important findings include (a) the event was only of ∼5‐min duration and was limited to a narrow (2°–3°) band of diffuse aurora; (b) the longitudinal span covered the entire nightside sector, possibly extending to the dayside; (c) the trigger seems to be a transient solar wind dynamic pressure pulse. In comparison, substorms usually last 1–2 hr and span almost the entire latitudinal width of the auroral oval. Magnetic perturbation events (MPEs) span hundreds km in radius. Both substorms and MPEs are mainly driven by disturbances in the magnetotail. A possible explanation is that the pressure pulse compresses the magnetosphere and enhances diffuse precipitation of electrons and protons from the inner plasma sheet, which elevates the ionospheric conductivity and intensifies the auroral electrojet. Therefore, the event exhibits a potentially new type of geomagnetic disturbance and highlights a solar wind driver that is enormously influential in driving extreme space weather events. 

Abstract The Poynting vector (Poynting flux) from Earth's magnetosphere downward toward its ionosphere carries the energy that powers the Joule heating in the ionosphere and thermosphere. The Joule heating controls fundamental ionospheric properties affecting the entire magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere system, so it is necessary to understand when and where the Poynting flux is significant. Taking advantage of new data sets generated from DMSP (Defense Meteorological Satellite Program) observations, we investigate the Poynting flux distribution within and around the auroral zone, where most magnetosphere‐ionosphere (M‐I) dynamics and thus Joule heating occurs. We find that the Poynting flux, which is generally larger under more active conditions, is concentrated in the sunlit cusp and near the interface between Region 1 and 2 currents. The former concentration suggests voltage generators drive the cusp dynamics. The latter concentration shows asymmetries with respect to the interface between the Region 1 and 2 currents. We show that these reflect the controlling impact of subauroral polarization streams and dawnside auroral polarization streams on the Poynting flux. 

Abstract Stable auroral red (SAR) arcs are luminous subauroral emissions produced by the collisional excitation of oxygen atoms during geomagnetically active times. While traditionally attributed to inner magnetospheric electron heating, recent observations and simulations challenge the exclusivity of this mechanism. Here, we resolve the ionospheric origin of SAR arcs using multi‐instrument observations and numerical simulations during the March 2015 geomagnetic storm. Both magnetospheric heat flux and ion‐neutral frictional heating, driven by subauroral plasma flows, independently generate SAR arcs with intensities surpassing background airglow by hundreds of Rayleighs. While thermal electron impact dominates red‐line emissions in both cases, the vertical structures diverge: frictional heating localizes emissions to altitudes of 250–400 km, whereas magnetospheric heating extends emissions above ∼280 km with broader altitudinal coverage. These results redefine SAR arc generation as a product of competing magnetospheric and ionospheric energy pathways, advancing our understanding of cross‐scale interactions in geospace.